Visual AIDS Research Fellow Dylan Huw considers care and refuge in the work of Japanese-American artist and gardener Ed Aulerich-Sugai (1950–1994)—a “posthumous collaborator” of Robert Glück’s About Ed—who prolifically documented his seven years living with AIDS in vivid paintings, drawings, and dream journals.
Speaking from the Asian Art Museum, San Francisco, on World AIDS Day in 1991, Ed Aulerich-Sugai gestures toward works in his series Power In Storage: Samurai Masks And Helmets (1990). He is gaunt and visibly fragile, and speaks with a nervy intensity befitting his work: a series of large pastel drawings centered upon the motif of the kabuto and men-yoroi, facial armor worn by warriors in feudal Japan, which were adorned with depictions of creatures both real and mythical. Drawing them, for Aulerich-Sugai, was an act of spiritual self-revelation. He stated: “They help me heal. I take on the power of the eel, and I take on the power of sight from the jumping wolf spider. They help me see inside myself.”
The drawings are informed by Aulerich-Sugai’s later-in-life interest in a method of Japanese woodblock printing called ukiyo-e, which translates directly to “picture[s] of the floating world.” Though his practice remained consistent across his several decades of art-making only in its restless heterogeneity, his “style” impossible to neatly pin down, this series—idiosyncratic, self-interrogating, shot through with a resilient, if unfashionable, faith in the spiritual capacity of art—perhaps comes closest to emblematizing his oeuvre. If the evocation of militant muscularity and the use of chalk—brittle, ephemeral—to conjure it into being might seem paradoxical in combination, Aulerich-Sugai’s semi-abstract images of nonhuman agents form a densely and starkly symbolic equilibrium of fragility and strength.
This is some of the only easily accessible footage of the artist discussing his work; he had been living with AIDS since 1987, and would live for a little over two years longer after this video was captured. This idea of his art-making as a practice of refuge, and of seeking and demanding power and strength from physical acts of creating, would recur—in his own words, in his work, in the voices and emails of his lovers and friends—as I immersed myself in Aulerich-Sugai’s life and work in order to write this text. In an interview with Vox published mere months after the World AIDS Day footage was shot, he said: “I believe my art has gotten me to this point. The art has been my best friend. It’s given me images to heal into. It’s been a healing tool for my spirit.”1
Though by no means unknown to those studied in the context in which he worked, Aulerich-Sugai’s body of work has been startlingly under-examined in scholarly, art-critical, and museological contexts. Spending time with reproductions of his drawings and paintings and speaking to those whose lives he touched profoundly has gradually built a picture of a restlessly probing and stylistically inventive artist whose artistic insights into life with AIDS during the epidemic’s peak were confrontational and surprising and above all extremely alive. The institutional omission of his diverse practice is particularly egregious given the admirable efforts of two of his most significant partners—Daniel Ostrow, a social worker; and Robert Glück, the renowned poet-novelist associated with San Francisco’s New Narrative movement—in jointly shepherding his legacy.
This autumn saw the release, by the New York Review Books, of About Ed, Glück’s experimental, genre-crossing memoir, which has appeared in fragments in numerous periodicals (such as The Paris Review and Frieze) and readings for many years. Many of its most moving sections portray with a kaleidoscopic intimacy the breadth of the two men’s relationship, with Glück punctuating the discovery and adventurousness of their freewheeling 1970s existence with snippets of life with Aulerich-Sugai as the disease gradually deteriorated his physical and mental capacities. “Ed’s life,” Glück writes, “is a flow of images, visual, then verbal—furious and sweet.”2 They met at a bus stop in the very early ’70s; they had both attended the same showing of Paul Morrissey’s Heat. Partners for most of that decade—Aulerich-Sugai’s twenties—they would remain close. About Ed is not only Glück’s own characteristically playful and baroque play on the AIDS memoir genre but a kind of “posthumous collaboration,” to borrow the phrasing of his recent Art of Fiction interview with The Paris Review: Glück was bequeathed the artist’s dream journals, which provide highly intimate and comprehensive insight into the workings of his partner’s subconscious. Aulerich-Sugai’s preternatural ability to remember his dreams, and compulsive documentation of them, mirrors his approach to his work: the artist never adopted an artistic technique, influence, or hobby without having to perfect it, obsessing over fine details until he achieved a mastery that he would just as quickly grow past.
It is through both Glück and Ostrow’s work, in vastly different fields, that what little of Aulerich-Sugai’s practice is visible in the public domain is so—and in collections such as those of the Tacoma Art Museum in Washington, the Leslie-Lohman Museum of Art in New York, and the Berkeley Art Museum in California. After working with Glück and Ostrow for a number of years, the art management agency KunstWorks succeeded in increasing the visibility of Aulerich-Sugai’s work by facilitating its inclusion in a number of group shows, such as AFTER/LIFE at Berkeley’s Doug Adams Gallery and With(out) With(in) the very moment at San Francisco Arts Commission Galleries. However, KunstWorks shuttered during COVID; a major auction of Aulerich-Sugai’s work, planned for spring 2020, was canceled. It is tempting to consider what might have been had the relationship with the organization continued, and where the interest in, and acknowledgement of, the artist’s work, in all its mighty interiority, might go from here. My immersion in Aulerich-Sugai’s life’s work has been informed by these questions, echoed and animated by ones proposed by Glück about halfway through About Ed: “What is the right question to ask about a life? Do I harm Ed by not knowing or by deleting some fact or anecdote?”3
Ed Aulerich-Sugai was born in Honolulu exactly halfway through the twentieth century to Japanese and Hungarian-Jewish parents. He was raised in Tacoma, Washington, studied at the San Francisco Art Institute, and lived an unlovely but sexually liberated existence in that city throughout the 1970s, where he remained for the rest of his life. When I spoke by video call with Ostrow and Glück, both sat in rooms Aulerich-Sugai had used to create his work, which continues to adorn their walls. Much of his earlier art took the form of quite decorative paintings, with picture-postcard clouds a frequent subject; in the 1980s, he became increasingly formally experimental. Aulerich-Sugai maintained his obsessive painting and drawing practice alongside a day job as a gardener and horticulturist at the Conservatory of Flowers in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park. As at the Conservatory, in his artwork he tended to the push-and-pull between knowledge and unknowability, to the desperate and ecstatic maintenance of life, to the porous boundaries between physical and immaterial forms of work and of care. He appears in a 1986 cover story on the Conservatory of Flowers, published by the San Francisco Examiner’s Image magazine, looking handsomely downcast.
By all accounts, Aulerich-Sugai was an interior person, quiet, a loner. (From About Ed: “In the early seventies, I taught him to speak. Before that, he was known as Silent Ed.”4) In the work he made while living with AIDS, there is little trace of the narratives of protest and community-building that characterize the most canonized artistic production made in urban centers in the United States in response to the epidemic’s first decade. It’s probably not too far off the mark to speculate that this relative lack of explicitly political subject matter, and the intense inwardness of his interests and methods, has played a role in keeping his work from being very widely seen outside of his home city; an artistic essentialism that demands that artists of certain kinds of experiences produce certain kinds of work (usually representational, easily categorized, and consistent in style). Nonetheless, he produced some of the most thrillingly alive depictions of being an actual body being ravaged by the disease’s everyday onslaught of pain, fatigue, and confusion.
His deeply felt drive to get up close with the inner workings of the human body might be described as a lifelong addiction, which came to the fore of his work during the seven years he spent living with AIDS but also far predating that period. An exhibition review as early as 1979—when his medium of choice was small glass sculptures and his subject, fish skeletons—described “a form of ecological art created by an artist whose social awareness of life’s fragility has been heightened by his recent personal experiences with illness and the imminence of death.”5 This fascination with the myriad zones between life and death gained, following his HIV diagnosis, an emphasis on the slippages between the bodily and spirit worlds, informed by a rekindled connection with his Japanese heritage and the vast troves of spiritual and mythological resources it offered him. The samurai mask drawings of Power In Storage are one such example of his pursuit of a subject in the hope that it would provide guidance in conditions of urgent need. Another is the Cells series, a group of over one hundred paintings produced between 1986 and 1989, in which Aulerich-Sugai speculates upon the visual character of the cells inside his own body as they faced the virus. In the Vox interview from 1992 quoted above, he elucidates the centrality of cells as a visual component in his work and an instrument of getting to the heart of his own mortality6:
An outlier in his oeuvre is a large, horizontal mixed-media work titled He Cries, She Cries: Homage to Our Sisters (1988), which uncharacteristically foregrounds larger social currents. It was made as an explicit gesture of gratitude and solidarity, “to give credit and respect,” Aulerich-Sugai wrote, “to our lesbian sisters in the gay community who have taken on the role of caregivers during the HIV epidemic.”7 It depicts disembodied facial features floating against planes of pastel pink and turquoise, and betrays an uncanny emotional pull; Ostrow named it his favorite work by his partner. In the tenderness of its appeal to solidarity and the collective nature of struggle, the work sheds new light on Aulerich-Sugai’s practice with the Cells series and beyond, revealing the empathetic core of all his self-examination.
Multiple meanings of caregiving echo and reverberate across the various stages of his life and his peripatetic practice—and through their afterlives. In addition to Glück’s literary work, Aulerich-Sugai has also occasionally been a protagonist of Ostrow’s research and public speaking. In a talk delivered at the fifth International Conference on Social Work and AIDS on June 23, 1993—six years following Aulerich-Sugai’s diagnosis and less than a year before his passing—Ostrow outlines shifts in his own perception of care as his partner’s condition deteriorated. He writes uncompromisingly of the debilitating effects of the seemingly endless cycles of Aulerich-Sugai’s illness, without shying away from the brutal mundanity of care work, nor from the difficulty of maintaining a meaningful relationship in the way it is usually conceptualized.
Repetition, it seems—as method, as medium, as modality—is another constant. Consider the Meditations series, a group of small, text-centered paintings Aulerich-Sugai made while undergoing chemotherapy. They are both brutally confrontational and informed by Zen Buddhist practices, consisting of concise phrases scrawled and re-scrawled, mantra-like, as a strategy for visualizing the chaos of having to confront the void every day:
I want my life back
I want my life back
I want my life back
or,
no more pain no more pain no more pain
or,
I am so afraid
I am so afraid
He was told he had only a few months left as early as 1988, but lived until 1994, dying the day before Valentine’s. In his final years, recounted at length in About Ed, he became affected by dementia. Glück’s emphasis in these passages is on a kind of ecstatic banality, the cyclical absurdity of illness and recovery, and the atemporal nature of watching a life with whom you share decades’ worth of memories glide slowly toward something like an ending. Aulerich-Sugai’s work stands as a monument to his resilient eccentricity and intellect in the face of prolonged decline. He lives on in his subjects and their fine, imaginative renderings, which maintain their power to provide refuge and healing and transportation to elsewheres unburdened by sickness or distress.
Ed has painted clouds for two decades; still, what does this sky say about him and his world? An emptiness without expectation, a panorama open in all dimensions. Is this the answer to the questions I ask myself ?—What to do with the day and the wide blue sky?—8
All artwork images reproduced by permission of the estate of Daniel R Ostrow, custodian of the Ed Aulerich-Sugai Collection and Archive.
Dylan Huw is a writer and curator living in Cardiff, Wales. He writes widely about contemporary art and visual culture, usually with a focus on queer and documentary practices. In his independent curatorial practice, he develops dialogic, research-led projects with artists working across disciplines and languages, which might take shape as public assemblies, residencies or publications. He has an M.A. in Contemporary Art Theory from Goldsmiths, University of London, and is an Associate of the situated arts organisation Peak Cymru.
Writing from the 2023 Research Fellowship is edited by Sophia Larigakis.