On the 30th anniversary of her passing, Visual AIDS Research Fellow Avik Sarkar discusses the life and work of Miss Kitty Litter Green (1962-1995), a trans feminine and gender nonconforming visual and performance artist. Through interviews, archival materials, and close readings of her artwork, Sarkar pieces together a comprehensive portrait of Miss Kitty's irreverent, excessive, and radically empathetic creative practice.
Her penis is entangled in her stiletto, her painted nails encircle her breast. Her radiant orange hair matches the shade of her heel. She reclines in bed, posing dramatically yet somehow effortlessly. She answers to multiple names—here she’s known as My Hermaphrodite Spirit Sister, but elsewhere this painting is designated a self-portrait.1 Who is she?
Miss Kitty Litter Green dissolved the boundaries between artist and subject, collapsing the self into the other. Miss Kitty, or simply Kitty, was a visual and performance artist from San Francisco with a penchant for glitter and glamor. Her work explores the aesthetics of gender nonconformity, capturing the idiosyncrasies of bodies unwilling to be contained within the suffocating limits of established binaries. In her artist statement for an open studio in May 1994, the year before she passed from AIDS-related complications, Kitty mused, “I am a traveling hermaphrodite story-teller . . . the fool, the minstrel. My art has always been about portraying the glamorous asymmetrical beauty of androgynous peoples.”2 Likewise, asymmetry structures the form and composition of her works. With eyes angled in opposite directions and faces contorted in quasi-Cubist fashion, her portraits defamiliarize the body to unveil its queer possibilities. In Kitty’s own words, “freaks are always asymmetrical.”3
Miss Kitty, My Hermaphrodite Spirit Sister, 1992
Flyer for open studio, May 1994
Kitty was born in Berkeley, California, on December 1, 1962—exactly 26 years before the first World AIDS Day. Her creativity was fostered early on by her mother Cleo, who passed away in September 2024. A writer herself, Cleo chronicled Kitty’s life in her memoir.4 Precociously queer, Kitty began cross-dressing at age four and mounted her first drag performance, “The Outrageous Beauty Review,” at fourteen. When she came out as gay as an adolescent and told her father that she had found a gay psychiatrist, he offered to help with the finances. Kitty was perplexed. “You don’t understand, Dad. The psychiatrist is for you.”5
Kitty was singular in her fabulous defiance of the oppressive norms that govern gender and sexuality. Cabaret artist Justin Vivian Bond remembers the “glamor goddess” as her “intersex spirit sister.”6 Those who knew her, and Kitty herself, described her gender identity in many different, sometimes seemingly contradictory ways. Though “one pronoun simply wasn’t enough,” I use she/her throughout this essay, both for the sake of consistency and in recognition of her love for the feminine.7
With the exception of a few male lovers, Kitty’s subjects were always feminine. Her portraits revolve around a highly stylized and exaggerated version of femininity. Keep Young and Beautiful (n.d.), which depicts Arturo Galster, a drag queen and Kitty’s travel companion, alludes in its title to a song from the film Roman Scandals (1933). The poster for the film portrays a ring of nude women in long blonde wigs chained to one another in bondage. Kitty envisions Arturo as one of these women—with the addition of “a great big hard-on.”8 In José Esteban Muñoz’s sense of the term, Kitty’s rendition “disidentifies” with the original image, reproducing it but with a twist, investing it with new and unexpected meaning.9 With its suggestions of sadomasochism, the painting’s shock value is too obvious to state—but it serves not to objectify the body on view but rather to eroticize it, to frame it not as perverse but as desirable. As Bond elaborates, Kitty’s works “celebrated the transgender body. Her paintings with penises and breasts—they were glorified, heightened. There was no victimization, no degradation of the central character.”10 Notice that in Keep Young and Beautiful, Arturo’s breasts are coyly covered by her platinum hair, her penis partially hidden. While pornography renders the trans feminine body hypervisible as a fetish, Kitty’s paintings flirt with the invisible; the body is simultaneously concealed and revealed as a site of elusive pleasures.
Kitty was eclectic in her style and eccentric in her technique. According to queer historian Gerard Koskovich, another friend of Kitty’s, she embodied the “do-it-yourself style of San Francisco drag artists of the era, who used the tawdriest of materials as a form of camp, as a critique of the values of luxury capitalism—and because “cheap” was all they could afford.”11 Kitty substituted paint for items in her purse (nail polish, eyeliner, rouge) and replaced canvas with cheaper, more portable substrates (cardboard, wallpaper samples, even toilet paper).
Miss Kitty, Keep Young and Beautiful, date unknown
Miss Kitty, Deserted zoo cage mural, Los Angeles © 1989, courtesy of the Dan Jones Estate
Kitty’s painting also took the form of graffiti, as illustrated in this postcard from 1989. Three belles are trapped in what was formerly a lion cage at a zoo in Los Angeles. With characteristic cleverness, Kitty stages a critique of violence in multiple forms, at once condemning animal cruelty (she became a vegetarian at age seven) and homophobic persecution. The words “QUEEN TANK” written on the outside of the cage evoke the long history of policing and incarcerating gay men and trans women for cross-dressing in public. “Inside the cell,” Kitty explained about queer ancestors jailed under these conditions, they would “scribble on the walls with eyebrow pencil.”12 Even under the most brutal circumstances, the creation of art was vital to queer existence—as Kitty’s own life demonstrates.
Though she called the Bay Area home, Kitty described travel as her “addiction,” her “drug of choice”—she ventured to Brazil, France, Egypt, and elsewhere.13 In Germany, where she performed in circuses and discos, she painted on the Berlin Wall not long before its fall. Another postcard features her piece from 1987, Home of Fallen Angels, a mural of two spirits in jockstraps who had departed this world for another—an ephemeral glimpse of a queer afterlife.
Miss Kitty, Berlin Wall mural © 1987, courtesy of the Dan Jones Estate
Kitty’s most cherished destination, where she returned several times, was Japan. At age twenty, she answered a newspaper ad in the Bay Area Reporter seeking a male stripper, not realizing the job was in Tokyo. With two days’ notice, she dropped out of San Francisco State University, moved out of the apartment she had rented a week before, and boarded a plane to Tokyo. There, she performed drag in clubs, bewildering and bewitching her audiences. Japanese aesthetic practices, and Asian visual culture more broadly, proved a pivotal influence on Kitty’s craft. She was especially captivated by Kabuki theater—in which all parts are played by men—and idolized the actor Bandō Tamasaburō V: “He was so like a creature from another planet. Not just femininity, but so much an ultra-femininity that it had a goddess quality.”14
Indeed, the goddess recurs as an omnipresent figure—and omnipotent force—in Kitty’s oeuvre. Her abiding interest in Eastern spirituality and religious iconography manifests in a painting of Kali, the Hindu goddess of death and destruction. In Kitty’s work, Kali, with her eight arms, simultaneously clasps a glass of wine, caresses her nipple, combs her hair, and paints liner around her three eyes. She is the apotheosis of femininity—and we’ve caught her mid-routine, it seems, as she gets ready to go out. The figure of the goddess, more generally, appears in various avatars across Kitty’s diaries and journals, which offer thanks for her blessings and prayers for healing. After her diagnosis, Kitty often turned to the goddess for guidance.
Miss Kitty, Untitled gouache commissioned by the Utopia Selective City Guide, a cultural section of Tokyo Today Magazine, 1992
Miss Kitty, Painting of Goddess Kali, commissioned by Michael Blue and Lewis Walden for the weekly club night Club Uranus, hosted at The EndUp nightclub, 1990
Kitty learned that she was HIV-positive around 1985 and began to experience symptoms around 1991, when she returned to San Francisco from Japan. Despite her illness, she flourished in the city’s queer counterculture and collaborated extensively with other avant-garde artists. She was a nightlife fixture, earning a reputation at the now-defunct Chaos, Klubstitute, and Club Uranus, where she performed alongside Doris Fish and Jerome Caja, fellow drag queen painters and friendly rivals who, in 1991 and 1995, respectively, were also lost to AIDS. She worked intimately with photographer Daniel Nicoletta, who characterized her as his “muse.”15 Everything in excess: for their first session together, she came prepared with no fewer than “four suitcases of drag, including six fully developed ensembles that she wanted to do in one evening”—and indeed, they did.16
Kitty contained multitudes—her talent extended into theater and music. A lifelong thespian, she toured nationwide with the San Francisco Shakespeare Company for two years after graduating high school in 1980. Later, she played minor roles in Tokyo Pop (1988) and the cult classic Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1992). With Birdie Bob Watts and Roxy Toxic, she sang in the band Clipped Out Recipes and composed playfully political lyrics. In the song “Victim of Society,” she protests the constraints of the gender binary: “I’m not a woman; I’m not a man. / I’m just the freak you think I am.”17 In “Seven Years,” the duration of time she had been seropositive, she insists:
You can take away my pills
You can take away my AZT
Perhaps this freak won’t live long,
But no one will take away my song.18
Addressed to an amorphous and anonymous “you,” this song condemns both a government apathetic to queer death and a public complicit in the suffering of “freaks.” Kitty accepts the abject position of the freak pushed to the margins—to reclaim this status is to take back others’ power over her. Though those in power might deny her treatment and jeopardize her health, though she might resign herself to death, she held on tightly to what she would never relinquish: her self-expression.
Arguably, Kitty’s most visceral mode of self-expression was performance, defined expansively. Birdie recounts a particularly memorable act in which Kitty sang “Doll on a Music Box” from the children’s musical Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (1968). She rotated on a pedestal in a bridal gown like a marionette—until the very end of the song, when she lifted the dress to reveal another queen sucking her cock underneath. Some spectators were titillated, others scandalized, but almost none could make sense of what was on display. A doll with a dick? “It is no longer possible to derive a judgment about stable anatomy from the clothes that cover and articulate the body,” Judith Butler would write almost a decade later.19
Video still of Miss Kitty performing, from The Miss Kitty Story (2006), a biographical video by Julia Maffei
Kitty’s scene literalized the question of what lies beneath the surface—who is under the dress? Even when confronted with full frontal, even when nothing was left to the imagination, the audience was still at a loss. “When one cannot with surety read the body that one sees . . . when one is no longer sure whether the body encountered is that of a man or a woman,” Butler proposed, “the reality of gender is also put into crisis.”20 Likewise, the artifice of Kitty’s drag disturbed the stability of gender, which fell apart in the exact moment when she exposed her naked body. The very idea of a woman with a penis was enough to generate massive confusion—what Butler might consider “gender trouble.” Kitty “made sure everybody knew she had a penis,” recalled Bond. “It was a political statement. It challenged the gaze (which could also be spelled gays). She was a sexualized femme in a culture obsessed with masc (which could also be spelled mask).”21 It was risky business to assert her sexuality so overtly as a trans feminine person—especially in historical conditions that prized aggressive masculinity. But what might be dismissed as vulgar, obscene, or simply frivolous was, for Kitty, precisely the source of resistance.
Kitty was equally irreverent to gender and to genre. She blurred the lines between media and synthesized the multiple dimensions of her practice. “Painting and drag, in a lot of ways, are the same thing. Drag is painting on another side of yourself, and finding that . . . there is another character inside of you,” she observed in an interview with the drag zine Venus Castina: The Art of Gender. “And painting is the same for me. I always paint people, faces. Even when I paint a portrait, I’m always feeling what it’s like to be that person . . . What does it feel like to be something that you were not born, and told by your parents that you are not?”22 For Kitty, artmaking provided an escape from the confines of the self—even if only momentarily. It was ripe with possibilities: to exist as someone or something else, to see a projection of your fantasy reflected back in the mirror, to emancipate yourself from the gender you were assigned at birth and the person you were expected to be. Kitty exercised a radical empathy, a wild curiosity about how it would feel to encounter the world in a different body, to live life otherwise.
Kitty’s attachment to life endured even as her illness intensified. She remained an active member of the Radical Faeries, a queer spiritual community where she gained vital energy; she would return from gatherings at the Faeries’ sanctuary in Wolf Creek, Oregon, in a “manic high.”23 In these final years she created at a frantic pace, driven by a sense of urgency, resulting in a prolific body of work that reckons poignantly, and sometimes painfully, with HIV and disability. With the gradual failure of her physical health came cognitive decline, too; she experienced phases of dementia accompanied by “erratic flights of fancy.”24
At times she referenced illness explicitly in her artistic practice, as in the collage Anxiety Disorders in People with HIV Disease (1994). As her body deteriorated, Kitty quite literally inserted parts of it into her art: Anxiety Disorders incorporates real human hair, likely in reference to the hair loss caused by early HIV drugs. She brought to the fore the excruciating corporeality of AIDS, which could never be captured fully by the abstractions of medicine (as pictured in the Prozac prescription within the work). Lists of symptoms and calculations of doses can hardly account for the embodied experience of the disease. Moreover, the sanitized and sterilized language of medicine pathologizes queerness—but instead of disavowing sexuality, Kitty embraced it. The bust in a leather harness at the corner of the collage signals her rejection of the erotophobia that infected clinical discourses around AIDS.
Given its title, Anxiety Disorders at first glance seems to convey the anxiety and anguish of life with AIDS, the overwhelming awareness of mortality. Are the faces screaming at us, vocalizing their trauma—or are they laughing, making fun of us? Perhaps this piece is actually about the life-sustaining sense of humor that allows queer/trans people to cope with structural neglect. As Hannah Arendt puts it, “Three minutes before certain death, I probably still would laugh.”25
Miss Kitty, Anxiety Disorders in People with HIV Disease, 1994
As she began to realize that the end was near, Kitty became increasingly politicized. In a striking photograph by Nicoletta from the 1993 San Francisco Pride Parade, Kitty’s ball gown—cinched with a lacy corset—is torn open to expose the catheter attached to her bare chest. Her IV bag dangling from her parasol and her shades in hand, she waves at the camera and smiles wide. “Lots of people at the fair were shocked by my tube. I assume this is good,” she journaled. “Lots of us fags need to be woken up a little bit.”26 Kitty refused to make her diagnosis invisible or keep it a secret. Rather, she brought it into the open—without shame and, as always, with grace—as a reminder to her peers that so many were still perishing. Laying bare her feminine body, complete with accessories, she dispelled the fiction that AIDS was only a cis gay man’s disease. In all her glamor, Kitty recast despair and disgust as sites of beauty and potentiality.
Though she confronted AIDS so fiercely, Kitty still confessed her “true desire to rip the bloody rubber from my breast and dance naked in a forest pool free of all tubes, free of disease, free of the limitations that keep closing in on my life.”27 For her, to be free was to liberate her body from the pressures of sickness and frustrations of frailty. After all, it was her body, its pains and its pleasures, that animated so much of what she had to say as an artist.
Kitty on the Klubstitute Float in the San Francisco LGBT Pride Parade, June 27, 1993. Photo by Daniel Nicoletta
Kitty’s last work, her “memento mori,” is the haunting portrait Miss Kitty as Angel (1994), captured by Nicoletta just a few months before her death.28
Though she was “skin and bones at this point,” she was determined to walk up the stairs to Nicoletta’s studio.29 The photograph was a collective effort, made possible by the support of her caretakers. In Kitty’s image, we see the devastation of the pandemic in flesh and blood—and yet she also gestures toward something ethereal. Her fragile body transcends the pain of the here and now as she transfigures into a celestial being. As Ms. Bob Davis writes, “Her emaciated, AIDS-ravaged body . . . fades, white on white, into an angel with wings.”30
Miss Kitty, aka Dan Jones, August 6, 1994, styling by Scott Pimintel, hair by Deena Davenport, wings by Hogan Vando, makeup by Juliet White, archival pigment print. © Daniel Nicoletta.
Kitty died on March 12, 1995, “in a tremendous ball of grace.”31 Throughout her life, and especially in her final years, she was obsessed with the color green, which she regarded as the “healing force” of the planet.32 She dyed her hair green first at ten years old and again at thirty-one; she rechristened herself “Miss Kitty Litter Green” and preferred to be addressed as “the Green Queen.” At her wake—held at Nicoletta’s studio, one of her favorite places—attendees decorated an altar with green dolls, makeup, and miniatures. Her drag sisters and fellow faeries paid homage by dressing up as her portraits. The memorial service doubled as a “drag free-for-all,” where her seemingly infinite wardrobe was divided up amongst friends.33
Kitty had also produced amulets for distribution at the ceremony, each filled with sage, suspended from a rosary, and imprinted with her cackling face in neon green—as if to ridicule anyone who would dare to forget her.
Collection of the GLBT Historical Society (San Francisco); gift of Gerard Koskovich.
In September 2000, the salon Glama-Rama! organized a retrospective of Kitty and Doris Fish’s art, aptly titled Angels. The exhibition made Kitty’s legacy clear: she “helped abolish the tired old female-bashing stereotypes of drag and gave birth to a fresh . . . uber-femme representation.”34 In a world hostile to femininity, and especially to non-normative femininity, Kitty carved out a space for elegance and extravagance. She found pleasure and fantasy where others saw bodies not worth protecting, lives not worth living. Sensual and resplendent, her work continues to resonate in its capacity to provoke and to heal. Nonetheless, she remains largely unrecognized in scholarship and criticism.35 Spirit sister, glamor goddess, angel, freak—she demands to be known in all her incarnations. Miss Kitty Litter Green’s vision speaks to the ongoing urgency of centering trans feminine and gender nonconforming artists in the cultural histories of AIDS. Or perhaps, as Kitty would say, we need an army of “total femme spirits to come down from outer space and give us a hand.”36